Omega-3 Fatty Acids May Prevent
More Sudden Deaths Than Implant Defibrillators
« Back to All News Articles
9/5/2006 - Omega-3 fatty acids may prevent more sudden deaths than automated
external defibrillators (AED) in homes and public places or implanted
defibrillators, according to the results of this new study.
Researchers compared these preventive strategies in a computer-simulated
community of 100,000 people that resembled the population of Olmsted
County, Minnesota, in 2000.
By increasing omega-3 fatty acids levels among the cyber citizens, Thomas
Kottke, M.D., and colleagues were able to decrease overall death rates
in the simulated population by 6.4 percent.
By contrast, AEDs reduced death rates by about 0.8 percent, and implanted
defibrillators (ICDs) reduced deaths by 3.3 percent, found the researchers
led by Kottke, a cardiologist at the Heart Center, Regions Hospital in
St. Paul, Minn.
People can raise their omega-3 fatty acid levels by taking supplements
or eating omega-3 fatty fish.
The study showed that raising omega-3 fatty acids “would have
about eight times the impact of distributing AEDs and two times the impact
of implanting ICDs,” Kottke said.
Three-quarters of the decline in deaths from the increased omega-3 fatty
acid levels would come from raising omega-3s among the healthy portion
of the population, according to the researchers.
Raising blood levels of omega-3 fatty acids in individuals after a heart
attack could save 58 lives a year, according to the simulation’s
predictions. Only seven lives per year were saved by AEDs, while implantable
defibrillators prevented 30 deaths each year under simulation conditions.
“Despite the fact that AEDs do save lives, they are unlikely to
ever have a substantial impact on rates of sudden death,” Kottke
said, explaining that a whole chain of events — from speedy application
of the device to surviving in the hospital — has to occur to save
a person with an AED.
Other studies propose that proper AED training may also make a difference
in how safely the devices would be used if they were as widely available
as in the simulation. A recent study by Mary Ann Peberdy, M.D., of the
Virginia Commonwealth University Health System and colleagues found very
few harmful incidents related to AED use by training lay volunteers.
“There were no inappropriate shocks and no failures to shock when
indicated,” Peberdy said of the study, which included more than
a thousand public facilities and residences in the United States and
Canada. “AEDs have an exceptionally high safety profile when used
by trained lay responders,” she added.
Kottke and colleagues also note the comparative costs of omega-3 versus
defibrillator treatment. For example, a population similar to the simulation
could raise their omega-3 levels with daily supplements for $5.8 million
a year.
If however, a large proportion of the community ate fish high in omega-3
or took purified omega-3 supplements like Coromega, rather than other
meat, much of the cost would be offset.
Equipping every household in a similar population with an AED would
cost $201 million, the researchers estimate. However, their analysis
shows that equipping first responders such as paramedics and firefighters
with AEDs for a comparable population would be “relatively inexpensive,” costing
only $195,000, Kottke said.
Reference:
Kottke, TE, Preventing sudden death with n-3 (omega-3) fatty acids
and defibrillators. Am. J. Prev. Med. 31(4), 2006
« Back to All News Articles
|